http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2007/10/02/table-test-updated/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:31:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2007/10/02/table-test-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-690 Richard Morton Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:01:50 +0000 http://www.maxdesign.com.au/?p=326#comment-690 What are current opinions on the requirement for table summaries as specified in the WCAG WAI priority 3 guidelines. My understanding is that they don't help with accessibility so the guideline is pretty much redundant, but I would love to hear if anyone differs with this view. What are current opinions on the requirement for table summaries as specified in the WCAG WAI priority 3 guidelines. My understanding is that they don’t help with accessibility so the guideline is pretty much redundant, but I would love to hear if anyone differs with this view.

]]> http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2007/10/02/table-test-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-669 Russ Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:58:13 +0000 http://www.maxdesign.com.au/?p=326#comment-669 I agree Jermayn, from a usability point of view. It will be interesting to see if screen reader users agree :) I agree Jermayn, from a usability point of view. It will be interesting to see if screen reader users agree

]]> http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2007/10/02/table-test-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-668 Jermayn Parker Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:50:26 +0000 http://www.maxdesign.com.au/?p=326#comment-668 Tables 2 & 3 seems to me to be easier to read and follow. I know you are after screen reader tests but for plain normal reading I prefer to look at those tables (2 & 3) than 1 & 4. Tables 2 & 3 seems to me to be easier to read and follow. I know you are after screen reader tests but for plain normal reading I prefer to look at those tables (2 & 3) than 1 & 4.

]]>