<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Source order, skip links and structural labels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/source-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/source-order/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:31:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrence Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/source-order/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/source-order/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Hi Russ, thanks for sharing these findings with us. Roger posted a link to the report to the W3C WAI mailing list to which I replied. I also posted my reply to the accessify forum where this report was also mentioned.

While I agree with your recommendation about clearly labelling parts of a site via headings (structural labels) I do not agree with your conclusions about source order which, in my view, are not supported by your findings. My response to Roger is available at accessify fourm: http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=32551#32551</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Russ, thanks for sharing these findings with us. Roger posted a link to the report to the W3C WAI mailing list to which I replied. I also posted my reply to the accessify forum where this report was also mentioned.</p>
<p>While I agree with your recommendation about clearly labelling parts of a site via headings (structural labels) I do not agree with your conclusions about source order which, in my view, are not supported by your findings. My response to Roger is available at accessify fourm: <a href="http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=32551#32551" rel="nofollow">http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=32551#32551</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/source-order/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/source-order/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Maybe try the previous post on this site called &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/about-structural-labels/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;About structural labels&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe try the previous post on this site called &#8220;<a href="http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/about-structural-labels/" rel="nofollow">About structural labels&#8221;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Dwyer</title>
		<link>http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/source-order/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Dwyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 02:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxdesign.com.au/2006/01/17/source-order/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m always trying to make my websites better.&#039;
But I am confused I&#039;m not sure you are using an established tern or have made one up &quot;Structural labels&quot; What are these are you talking about form lables? please give an example as I have search around for this tern even on w3c.org and can find know reference to it.

good addressability practice would would imply that if you are introducing    a new tern or concept that you would insert a link to a definition or example!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always trying to make my websites better.&#8217;<br />
But I am confused I&#8217;m not sure you are using an established tern or have made one up &#8220;Structural labels&#8221; What are these are you talking about form lables? please give an example as I have search around for this tern even on w3c.org and can find know reference to it.</p>
<p>good addressability practice would would imply that if you are introducing    a new tern or concept that you would insert a link to a definition or example!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

